From OnBoard - Newsletter of the BCG
Elizabeth Shown Mills, "Analyzing Wills for Useful Clues," OnBoard 1 (May 1995): 16.
Of all the documents we hope to find on people of the past, wills can be the most informative and the most misleading.
Far less rigid in form and content than deeds, licenses, or bonds, wills offer their authors the opportunity to express themselves, their personalities, and their preferences and prejudices. But a will's informality and latitude, clouded by changing customs and lexicology, can lead to misinterpretations and missed clues.
As we analyze a will for latent clues, the following questions are prime:
Is the will an "original" or a recorded copy? If it is an original on loose paper:
If the will is a clerk's recorded copy:
Does the will begin with an oath? (e.g.: "In the name of God, Amen . . . .") If so, the testator was not Quaker or did not belong to a similar religious body that eschewed oath-taking.
Are "infants" or minors mentioned? If so:
Also remember:
Was education willed for children prior to the mid-1800s? Outside the Northeast, mid-to-older teens were not likely to be schooled unless the family was elite.
Does one heir receive only a token? Don't assume that heir was "written out" of the will. Check conveyances and tax records to see if he or her husband received property in advance. If testator refers to such prior bequests, again check conveyances and property rolls.
Does a grandchild receive a special share? If of same surname, this is likely the child of a deceased son or an unmarried daughter. Grandparental wills often favored such children because they lacked a male provider.
Does testator state relationships to certain people? Those terms can mislead. Sons/daughters-in-law may be stepchildren. Sisters/brothers may be in-laws. Cousins may be any relationship past the first degree. Nephew may be grandchild.
Does the will mention debts, property, or beneficiaries in another region? This may be a clue to prior residence or origins.
Are slaves manumitted? Significance can depend upon age and color of those freed, religious affiliation of testator, or whether testator has a living wife or descendants. If a master freed all slaves or willed they be freed after the death of his spouse, then religious scruples may be at work. If he freed slave children, particularly when calling them mulatto and citing their mother as Negro (most particularly if he names no wife in his will) then kinship may exist. If a slave couple or elderly slave is freed, long-term service is more likely to be the motivation.
Slave names may also suggest other relatives of the testator, since the given names of slaves often duplicated those within the master's family.
In general:
Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL
This article was originally published in OnBoard, BCG's educational newsletter and is protected by copyright. Individuals may download and print copies for their personal study. Educators are granted permission to provide copies to their students as long as BCG, OnBoard, and the appropriate author are credited as the source of the material. Republication elsewhere is not permitted.
This article was originally published in OnBoard, BCG's educational newsletter and is protected by copyright. Individuals may download and print copies for their personal study. Educators are granted permission to provide copies to their students as long as BCG, OnBoard, and the appropriate author are credited as the source of the material. Republication elsewhere is not permitted.